Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Newcastle United managing director Derek Llambias defends sponsorship deal with Wonga



Newcastle United’s managing director Derek Llambias has launched a staunch defence of the club’s sponsorship by controversial loan company Wonga – a deal which will see the club’s stadium revert to its original name of St James’ Park.

Newcastle's ground will be renamed St James' Park

Although the exact figures of the shirt sponsorship deal have not been released, Telegraph Sport understands it will be worth more than £8 million a year over the course of the four-year agreement.
Newcastle owner Mike Ashley caused outrage on Tyneside when he decided to change the name to the Sports Direct Arena almost 12 months ago, reportedly to showcase the branding companies would receive in return for naming rights. But Wonga has decided to curry favour by reverting to the traditional name and deflect claims that it is not a suitable commercial partner for a Premier League club.
“I only have reservations about the price,” said Llambias. “I always want the biggest price and they want to try and get the smallest price. We have come to a very good value. It means another player on the pitch.
“They have a community feel about them. The money will be also go to the academy and our foundation. It is our biggest-ever commercial deal and we are happy with it.”
There is nothing illegal about Wonga’s enterprise, but the firm’s charge of 4,214 per cent APR on its internet-based payday loans has been criticised by local MPs, consumer groups and trade unions.
The St James’ Park signs will be put up in time for Newcastle’s next home game against Club Brugge in the Europa League on Oct 25. The money it will bring will give the club more flexibility in the transfer market and will immediately provide £1.5 million to be spent on their academy.
Manager Alan Pardew added: “Getting the St James’ name back is fantastic. It is a clever move in terms of getting fans in a good place.”
Newcastle missed out on being given category-one status this year as part of the Premier League’s Elite Player Performance Plan, but believe they will be awarded the highest grade — and with it £750,000 a year of funding — in the coming months.

Saturday, 4 August 2012

Luis Suarez must move on from racism row - Brendan Rodgers




Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers says Luis Suarez has to "move on" from last season's racism controversy, however difficult the striker may find it.
Suarez was banned for eight games after being found gulity of racially abusing Manchester United's Patrice Evra.
Rodgers said: "Luis probably still feels a little bit of injustice about last season, but for me the message is that we have to move on.
"We have to move forward. Let's let it go now, however hard it is."
The incident dominated Liverpool's season, with Suarez refusing to shake hands with Evra before the 2-1 defeat by United in February, and then questioning the "political power" Manchester United have in English football.
Continue reading the main story
Opposition fans only give people stick because they're good players - you don't see bad ones getting it
Brendan Rodgers
Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson claimed Kenny Dalglish's handling of the episode cost the Anfield legend his job as manager.
Rodgers, who left Swansea City to replace Dalglish in the summer, accepts Suarez is likely to continue to be criticised for the Evra incident when he returns to action.
There were signs that British football supporters are not going to let the striker forget last season when he - and the Uruguayan national anthem - were booed during an Olympic match at the Millennium Stadium.
Suarez described the booing as a "lack of respect", but Rodgers said: "The first point is that opposition fans only give people stick because they're good players - you don't see bad ones getting it."
Suarez's participation in the Olympics came to an end with Uruguay's defeat by Team GB.
Rodgers is looking forward to welcoming the 25-year-old back into the fold with the Reds' season having already begun with Thursday's 1-0 victory over FC Gomel in the first leg of their Europa League third qualifying round clash.
"It will be fantastic to have Luis coming back, and he is already fighting fit," said Rodgers.
"He will have a couple of days off and join up with us after the weekend. I'm really looking forward to working with him.
"He's been playing games, so he will already be up to a decent level of fitness, maybe even higher really, because he's had more competitive games."

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

John Terry racism trial: Chelsea captain says Anton Ferdinand's brother Rio would not answer his phone calls




On the third day of his trial John Terry stressed he wanted to speak to police about alleged racist abuse because "there was nothing out there that would show that I had done anything wrong". The Chelsea captain also revealed he tried to contact Rio Ferdinand following the allegations but his alleged victim's brother wouldn't answer.

John Terry racism trial: Chelsea player insists 'I wanted to go to the police' after allegations of racism towards Anton Ferdinand
Case for the defence: John Terry continues to give evidence to the court 
The 31-year-old England and Chelsea defender is accused of calling Anton Ferdinand a "f****** black c***" during a Premier League game on Oct 23 last year.
He denies a racially aggravated public order offence, saying he was sarcastically repeating the slur that Ferdinand mistakenly thought he had used.
Continuing his evidence at Westminster Magistrates' Court today, Terry said: "I knew there was nothing out there that would show that I had done anything wrong.
"I was keen to go forward with my police statement, my FA statement. If I had anything to hide I wouldn't have done that."
He said he made a statement before seeing any film footage of the incident.
Earlier, prosecutor Duncan Penny put it to Terry that he had made a remark about having sex with Ferdinand's girlfriend, in response to taunts about his alleged affair with a team-mate's ex-partner. Terry denied this.
Terry said Ferdinand's brother Rio, with whom he played at the heart of England's defence, would not take his call in the aftermath.
Terry, Chelsea's most successful captain, tried to phone the Manchester United defender to discuss media reports of the allegations because he did not have Anton Ferdinand's phone number.
Mr Penny, describing the allegations against Terry as "big potatoes", said he could have spoken to the alleged victim.
He said: "You might have got in touch with Mr Ferdinand and said 'Help me out here – this is going completely nuts'."
Terry, wearing a dark suit and pink tie, said he spoke to Jamie Morallee, who helped both players out with property investments in the same street.
Terry said: "I did attempt to call Rio and he wouldn't take my call, I didn't have Anton's number."
Mr Penny countered Terry's account that he issued a statement quickly because he had nothing to hide by saying: "In the game of PR it's very important to get your story out quickly, isn't it?"
It is expected Terry's Chelsea and England team-mate Ashley Cole will give evidence today.

Thursday, 5 July 2012

Arsenal striker Robin van Persie confirms he won't sign a new contract with Arsène Wenger's side



Manchester City are ready to bid £20 million for Robin van Persie after the Arsenal captain issued an extraordinary statement in which he outlined his desire to leave and openly questioned the club’s direction under Arsène Wenger.

Arsenal striker Robin van Persie confirms he won't sign a new contract with Arsène Wenger's side
Summer wonder: Robin van Persie is also a target for Juventus 
Arsenal reacted on Wednesday night by saying that they were “confident” that Van Persie would see out a contract which does not expire until next summer but, privately, are furious that their star player should go public with such a provocative statement.
They were given no prior warning that Van Persie was planning to speak out, with Wenger and chief executive Ivan Gazidis especially seething over the conduct of Kees Vos, the Dutchman’s agent.
Arsenal are well aware that Vos was a guest at the Etihad last season of Brian Marwood, the Manchester City director of football administration, and they believe that Van Persie is being badly advised.
Telegraph Sport revealed in May that Van Persie was not willing to extend his contract and, late on Wednesday afternoon, he confirmed on his website that he would definitely not sign a new deal.
He then went on to say that, during a meeting with Wenger and Gazidis, it had “become clear to me that we in many aspects disagree on the way Arsenal FC should move forward”.
Van Persie’s statement is being interpreted as a blatant attempt to force a move this summer and, while Arsenal have received no bids or inquiries, the clear suspicion is that he is now actively trying to generate an auction among Europe’s leading clubs.
The desire of Manchester City and Juventus to sign Van Persie is no secret but, according to sources, Manchester United are also now interested. Barcelona, Real Madrid and Chelsea will also consider their position.
City want to find buyers for some of their existing strikers, including Emmanuel Adebayor and Roque Santa Cruz, before finalising a deal for Van Persie. As with Samir Nasri last summer, United’s problem would be to match both the wages and transfer fee that City can offer. They have also not paid a transfer fee for a player over the age of 28 since Dimitar Berbatov four years ago.
Wenger now faces the nightmare of a repeat of last summer’s saga when his captain, then Cesc Fàbregas, was also desperate to leave. Fàbregas was eventually granted his move to Barcelona and Wenger must now weigh up the advantages of a quick sale and no prolonged uncertainty or acrimony against the damage to his team from losing Van Persie.
Only this week, he referred to Arsenal’s dependency on Van Persie and said that he wanted to keep the Dutchman at “all costs”.
One advantage this summer is that Wenger has already recruited two potential replacements in Lukas Podolski and Olivier Giroud. Both, however, are unproven in the Premier League and are likely to need a season to fully adapt.
Wenger’s initial reaction on Wednesday night was that the club should hold Van Persie to his contract unless there is an extraordinary offer.
He also sanctioned a statement from Arsenal that suggested they would still try to persuade him to stay for another season. “We have to respect Robin’s decision not to renew his contract,” said the club statement.
“Robin has one year to run on his current contract and we are confident that he will fulfil his commitments to the club.”
The situation will come to a head in 10 days’ time, if not sooner, with Van Persie expected back for pre-season training on July 16 and then due to travel with Arsenal to Malaysia for the start of their summer tour on July 21.
Van Persie, though, said that the decision not to extend his contract was based on sporting and not financial considerations.
“As announced earlier this year I had a meeting with the Boss [Wenger] and Mr Gazidis after the season,” said Van Persie. “This was a meeting about the club’s future strategy and their policy. Financial terms or a contract have not been discussed, since that is not my priority at all.
“I personally have had a great season but my goal has been to win trophies with the team and to bring the club back to its glory days.
“Out of my huge respect for Mr Wenger, the players and the fans I don’t want to go into any details, but unfortunately in this meeting it has again become clear to me that we in many aspects disagree on the way Arsenal FC should move forward. As soon as Mr Gazidis is back from his two-week holiday in America further meetings will follow.”
Arsenal on Wednesday night denied, however, that Gazidis was on a two-week holiday.

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Mikel Arteta to miss end of Arsenal season through injury


Mikel Arteta


Mikel Arteta to miss end of Arsenal season through injury

Arsenal midfielder Mikel Arteta will miss the remainder of the season with ankle ligament damage.
The Spaniard picked up the injury during Arsenal's shock 2-1 defeat by Wigan on Monday and left the Emirates Stadium on crutches.
While subsequent scans have revealed no break, the ligament damage is serious enough to rule the 30-year-old out of Arsenal's four remaining matches.
The Gunners still have Chelsea, Stoke, Norwich and West Brom to play.

Arsenal run-in

21 Apr
Chelsea (h)
28 Apr
Stoke (a)
5 May
Norwich (h)
13 May
West Brom (a)
With Jack Wilshere also out for the season, Abou Diaby struggling for match fitness and Yossi Benayoun ineligible to face Chelsea on Saturday as he is on loan from the Blues, manager Arsene Wenger has been left with a selection headache.
Aaron Ramsey is the most likely to come into the side in place of Arteta, with Tomas Rosicky, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Alex Song making up the rest of the Arsenal midfield.
Wenger has warned his players of the importance of the match against Chelsea, with Tottenham Hotspur and Newcastle United in position to take advantage of any Arsenal slip-up in the race to finish in the top four to gain a Champions League place
.

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

Former World Cup referee Clive Thomas criticises standards


Referee holding a ball


Former World Cup referee Clive Thomas criticises standards

A former top-level British referee has criticised modern officials following a string of controversial decisions in the Premier League over Easter weekend.
Ex-World Cup referee Clive Thomas said: "I've lost faith in referees. I think refs are missing things."


QPR manager Mark Hughes and Wigan boss Roberto Martinez both spoke out after key incidents went against their sides in the battle to avoid relegation.
"You should have confidence that referees will get key decisions right," said Hughes after the final whistle. "Just lately a lot of managers have lost faith in them."
Welshman Thomas, 75, refereed at the 1974 and 1978 World Cups, and the 1976 European Championships.
And he reckons Hughes is "100% right" to question referees' abilities following the dismissal of Shaun Derry during Rangers' 2-0 defeat at Old Trafford.
Thomas said: "We haven't got our act together at all.
"I don't see that the referees of today are even in the right positions to give right decisions. That concerns me.
"Referees today are concerned, it seems, far more about what the assessors think of them, and are not thinking how to referee a game.
"It never worried me what the assessors would say."
Manchester City striker Mario Balotelli was sent for two bookable offences in the defeat by Arsenal on Sunday, but much post-match coverage focused on a challenge on Alex Song which went unpunished.
Thomas said: "That tackle was a disgrace. The studs were up and went on the player's leg. He should have been sent off then but he wasn't.
"The referee was right there. If he didn't see it, why didn't he see it? That would be my concern if I was the referee.
"I was far better than modern refs. British referees were better than they are today.
"

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Alan Pardew admits 'silly things got said' in Martin O'Neill spat


Alan Pardew Newcastle United Martin O'Neill Sunderland
The Newcastle United manager, Alan Pardew, left, gestures towards Sunderland's Martin O'Neill during the Tyne-Wear derby.
Martin O'Neill's first Tyne-Wear derby did not end with the traditional drink in Alan Pardew's office after the two managers became embroiled in some unseemly touchline exchanges.
"I think I shall go and climb on the bus," said O'Neill, after he was asked if he and Newcastle's manager were poised for a friendly chat. "I wanted to have a glass of wine with Martin but I'm told he's gone," said Pardew. "Silly things got said on the bench, it got out of hand and it was unsavoury but it happens.
"It's a passionate game but maybe I could have been a bit more grown-up about it. Maybe Sunderland's bench handled it better. If one or two of us stepped over the line I'll apologise for it."
Newcastle's manager evidently said something provocative to his Sunderland counterpart as he leapt towards O'Neill, celebrating wildly, after the home side won a second-half penalty missed by Demba Ba.
"I've never done that before," conceded Pardew whose goalkeeping coach, Andy Woodman, was sent to the stands by the referee at half-time. "It looks terrible but it was just sheer relief we'd got a penalty. Unless you're a manager or a player you don't understand the pressure of this game, a lot of emotion was involved. I was really frustrated."
Pardew, who claimed Lee Cattermole's idiotic lunge on Cheik Tioté after just 45 seconds had been "premeditated", rebutted O'Neill's suggestion that members of Newcastle's backroom staff had visited Mike Dean, the referee, at half-time. "I can tell you it's completely untrue," he said. "None of our staff are allowed in the ref's room. It's not right."
Cattermole, the Sunderland captain, was sent off for directing foul and abusive language at Dean after the final whistle. "Lee can't be doing that, he should leave it to me," said O'Neill. "But Lee's mitigating circumstance is that he felt too many decisions had gone Newcastle's way in the second half. They should count themselves lucky to have finished with 11 men. Cheik Tioté should have been sent off."
O'Neill said he had "no complaints" about Stéphane Sessègnon's red card for elbowing Tioté before enthusing about the occasion. "The derby was absolutely everything people have told me – the hostility, the fervour, everything. It's two points slipped through our fingers but, in a perverse way, I enjoyed it."
Pardew had high praise for Shola Ameobi, scorer of the equaliser, and Hatem Ben Arfa whose half-time introduction changed the game's complexion. "I love Shola to bits, the chance couldn't have fallen to a better person," he said. "He brings important qualities passed down from his parents to this club. Some of Hatem's play was breathtaking; it was his best 45 minutes for us. I have to find a way of getting him in my team."

Sunday, 4 March 2012

No Chelsea manager will last under Roman Abramovich's risible ownership


Analysing Russian diplomacy, historians used to notice a tendency to act decisively – sometimes brutally – regardless of whether it was the right course. The purpose was to avoid doing nothing: to fight one’s way out of a corner.

Andre Villas-Boas and Roman Abramovich - No Chelsea manager will last under Roman Abramovich's risible ownership
Happier days: Andre Villas-Boas and Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich
Roman Abramovich displays this old historical tendency. He fears indecision, drift – so now he is searching for his eighth Chelsea manager in nine years.
He sets up a “project” for change, paying Porto £13.3million to release Andre Villas-Boas, then panics nine months later, dumping blame on the manager and ignoring the failings of directors, middle men, the recruitment department and, most of all, the players.
The headline on this piece should be “Roberto Di Matteo on the brink” because that is the perpetual state of all Chelsea coaches.
Then, when the permanent successor is appointed, he too should be described as a man “on the brink”, even as he is grinning for photographers in the stands of Stamford Bridge.
If Abramovich were serious about holding his workforce to account he would have looked to his inner circle, and those like Michael Emenalo, the so-called technical director, who are presumably also part of any problem.
He would have evolved beyond his reductionist view that any weakness at a football club is traceable to the poor tortured soul in the dugout.
We all know this is a risible way to run an organisation. It provides shelter for time-serving execs and creates a culture of accountability for some and exemptions from blame for others.
Who, for example, spent £50million on Fernando Torres? Not Villas-Boas. On whose watch was Chelsea's best signing of the last 12 months made (Juan Mata)? Answer — AVB’s.
Chelsea’s statement yesterday spoke of the need to “make a change”. This is a euphemism for permanent revolution.
The experiment with Villas-Boas, who was the same age as Frank Lampard when he was appointed, followed the disastrous decision to sack Carlo Ancelotti 12 months after his Premier League and FA Cup Double.
The excuse was that Abramovich wanted to move beyond the old bulldozer style in favour of audience-winning entertainment.
Nobody has explained, then or now, why Ancelotti, who is managerial nobility, was thought incapable of effecting that transformation.
After a lot of asking around, Abramovich blundered in the direction in the direction of Villas-Boas, paying £28 million to replace Ancelotti and his team.
That included pumping money into the transfer market for managers in the form of the compensation to Porto.
The studious, intense AVB arrived from Portugal certain he had a mandate to dismantle the old Chelsea functionalism and replace it with something more uplifting.
Maybe he did, but the brief expired when he struck a run of three wins in 12 league games and the old ghouls massed against him.
He was sycophantic in support of John Terry over the Anton Ferdinand alleged racism incident and seemed to want to take on Frank Lampard, identifying him as the biggest block to progress.
In other words he created enemies without crushing them: a serious error, as the more Machiavellian Jose Mourinho might have told him.
The sinister silence favoured by Abramovich himself lent itself to uncertainty, first, then instability when it became apparent that senior players were becoming disruptive and defiant.
There are plenty of ways to get rid of a manager beyond complaining to the owner, among them drawing at home with Birmingham City in the FA Cup and losing at West Bromwich Albion.
These are acts guaranteed to bring the whirr of chopper blades above Chelsea’s Cobham training ground.
For Abramovich to think the manager is always the problem, he would have to think it normal that the left-back shoots the intern with an air rifle, the captain is charged with racially abusing Anton Ferdinand (an allegation John Terry denies) and a smoke grenade is thrown inside the training ground (as it was on Friday).
Watching Abramovich’s stewardship, you wonder how he made a cent in business. He seems intent on vandalising his own £700 million-plus investment while ignoring the real oversights.
It beggars belief, for instance, that they should have spent £90 million on Torres, David Luiz and Ramires while also missing the target with the likes of Romelu Lukaku.
Below a conventional corporate upper tier (Ron Gourlay, the chief executive, and Bruce Buck — the chairman) — Abramovich listens to overlapping circles of confidantes, few of whom are serving him well.
Some very capable people carry on with their jobs as best they can but there is always the sense that real power is an invisible force that is always ready to sweep the foundations away.
By any measure Abramovich is an autocrat in a world not built for the expression of extreme personal whims. A close ally of Vladimir Putin, he applies comparable impatience and intolerance to his sporting empire.
Those who can hide their mistakes and display unconditional obedience survive. The front-of-house stooge — the manager — picks up the tab whenever things go wrong.
The awkward squad in Chelsea’s dressing room will be feeling very smug. Another victim is chalked up.
But there is a deeper problem for them and their capricious owner. You look at this Chelsea side now and see a lack of players good enough to mount another title challenge.
With a 3-1 first-leg deficit against Napoli, Abramovich’s Champions League dream is receding.
In management circles, the deal has long been clear: take the Chelsea job, watch your back and wait for the dismissal cheque.

Thursday, 1 March 2012

Why the North East derby is all that matters



It is parochial in its intensity, local in its focus and short-sighted in its importance, but it is the only game that matters in the North-East.
The Tyne-Wear derby has few rivals. Every club likes to think its derby is the special one; unique in its significance and who can argue against them.
Every derby is important, special and passionate for those whose bragging rights are at stake.
But for me – and I was not born, bred or raised in the North East – this is one of the best for the sheer “perched on the edge of the cliff” sensation that comes with the build-up.
Anyone who has sat in the middle of a Newcastle vs Sunderland game and felt the tension, sampled the hatred, tasted the sweetness of victory or swallowed the bitterness of defeat will know what I mean.
For the Newcastle and Sunderland fans reading this, there will be some who have already started to feel a little queasy, the pulse will start racing, your body temperature will rise. It’s alright, open a window, you can come back to this when you’ve calmed down!
Before the corresponding fixture last season I sat on a wall and gathered my thoughts – it had been a late finish the night before – and suddenly found myself in the middle of the tribal warfare.
I’ve covered countless North East derbies, but I’d normally been in the comfort of the press room discussing the drama before it unfolded on the pitch. That had its moments.
The local Tyneside and Wearside press packs have their divisions on this matter and there is little camaraderie, before or after kick-off.
The hacks from the Sunderland Echo glare, as the boys from the Newcastle Evening Chronicle circle . As for the Northern Echo and The Journal – my old paper – there are Sunderland and Newcastle fans sharing desks and offices.
Thankfully, it has never come to blows, although I’m told it has come close on occasions. Most of the national journalists were born in the North-East and have their loyalties accordingly.
This time I wanted more fresh air so I was outside when things began to crackle. It started with a few boos and jeers in the distance. A few inaudible chants. More and more black and white shirts began to surround me. The boos and jeers grew louder. I had no idea what was happening, but I should have guessed.
Sunderland is only 12 miles away from Newcastle and is linked by the same Metro system, as well as train network.
Several hundred Black Cats had used public transport to get to the game and, flanked either side by police in riot gear, they were being escorted from Newcastle Central Station up to St James’ Park.
The atmosphere was hostility and defiance brought to the boil. You could see both sets of fans wanted to get at each other – and so did the police who were impressively swift in snuffing out any hint they would.
The threat of violence was palpable. It always is. Tindersticks and matches spring to mind. We can only hope the police keep a lid on it again.
It was magnificent and abhorrent at the same time. For two days of the year on derby day, there is nothing more than hatred, yet it is not so long ago that fathers would take their sons to Newcastle one week and Sunderland the next.
As someone from outside the region, I know the people of Newcastle and Sunderland, Northumberland and Durham, share far more in spirit, outlook and humour than they would care to admit. The North-East can be seen as a whole. Not that I would dare say as much on Sunday of course.
Sat outside St James’ Park – yep used it again – last season it was defenders versus invaders, Roundheads vs Cavaliers, the Mods (Geordies) versus the Rockers (Mackems), regional jealousy and rivalry fused with historical grievances.
This is about more than just a game of football, yet the result is all that matters 90 minutes later. Just ask those Sunderland fans who endured last season’s 5-1 defeat on Tyneside.
Then there is the national picture. Newcastle and Sunderland are probably the two biggest under-achievers in English football and that has helped attach far more importance to the derby than other clubs who have bigger things to worry about and celebrate.
They should have won far more between them, yet Newcastle have not lifted a piece of major silverware since the Fairs Cup in 1969. As for their last domestic trophy, you have to go back to the FA Cup in 1955.
Sunderland lifted that prize in 1973, but an entire generation of supporters has had nothing to celebrate other than promotion back to the top tier of English football.
League titles belong in the distant past and so the battle for local supremacy is a trophy both clubs fight for each year.
For former Sunderland manager Steve Bruce, it was defeat to Newcastle at the Stadium of Light back in August that pushed him towards the exit door.
After last season 5-1 defeat on Tyneside and their failure to beat the enemy on their own territory, the defeat at the start of this season was too much to take. There was also the small issue of Bruce being a Geordie too.
However, if you ask most Newcastle players, that 1-0 win was the game that launched them on their way to a surprisingly successful campaign that will see them entertain their rivals this weekend sitting sixth in the table.
Newcastle are ten points better off than Sunderland in the league, but lose at St James’ Park – oops that’s a third time – on Sunday and they won’t feel like it. This weekend, nothing else matters.

Monday, 27 February 2012

Arsenal players considered soft-centred gave lion-hearted displays against Tottenham



Arsenal's sudden return to form in their 5-2 win over arch rivals Tottenham was exemplified in four key ways.

Arsenal players considered soft-centred gave lion-hearted displays against Tottenham
Sheer joy: Tomas Rosicky celebrates his goal 
Team spirit
The pre-match words of Emmanuel Petit summed up the general view on the strength of this Arsenal team’s backbone. “These players are fragile, they can sink. They are peacocks in the middle of the farm,” he said. Not on Sunday. From 2-0 down after 34 minutes – and with the whole of the Emirates ready to rise up in rebellion amid the fear of another rout — they were like lions. It was, by any standards, a truly extraordinary display of character.
Tactics
The teamsheet would have caused considerable alarm to Arsenal fans. No Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain or Gervinho, while in came Yossi Benayoun and Tomas Rosicky. The entire defence that succumbed against AC Milan was also again selected. It all left Arsenal looking soft-centred. Instead, though, they flooded the midfield and dominated the vast majority of the game. Arsène Wenger, the Arsenal manager, later said that Harry Redknapp was right to bring on Sandro and Rafael van der Vaart in an attempt to “thicken” the Tottenham Hotspur midfield, but Emmanuel Adebayor simply became isolated. “We were technically faster and superior to them,” said Wenger.
Finishing
Arsenal are used to losing matches even after enjoying the majority of possession. It all points to a general profligacy in front of goal that has been masked by the extraordinary goal-scoring form of Robin van Persie. On Sunday, though, was a moment when others in the squad were equally clinical. Theo Walcott converted his two chances superbly, Tomas Rosicky scored his first Premier League goal in two years while Bacary Sagna’s headed finish would have pleased an established centre-forward. Yossi Benayoun was also a constant threat.
Leadership
Whenever Wenger is questioned about the perceived absence of leaders in this Arsenal team, it has become almost a standard response to cite all the players who have captained their country. With Tottenham taking a 2-0 lead and Scott Parker initially dominant, it was the moment when Wenger needed his leaders. Robin van Persie immediately dragged Arsenal off the floor with several near-misses before his wonderful equaliser, while Rosicky produced his most influential performance in his six years at the club.

Thursday, 23 February 2012

Jose Mourinho return is possible – but he has to say sorry to Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich



There are 18 million reasons why it might be hard for Jose Mourinho to return to Chelsea this summer if – and it is still an if – Roman Abramovich decides he wants to part company with Andre Villas-Boas and go back for the self-styled “Special One”.

Jose Mourinho - Chelsea chairman Roman Abramovich may be prepared to hire Jose Mourinho again
Building bridges: Jose Mourinho had some contact with Chelsea over the summer 


There has undoubtedly been some rapprochement between club and former manager, starting last summer following the sacking of Carlo Ancelotti, when Mourinho’s name was mentioned but they decided to go for Villas-Boas who, it was hoped, would be like his fellow Portuguese but without the abrasive edge.
Certainly relations are not as ice cold as they were when Mourinho challenged Abramovich to sack him in September 2007 — and the Russian billionaire did.
Mourinho has made no secret that he wants to return to the Premier League when he leaves Real Madrid, and that could well happen this summer, but as much as he might consider Tottenham Hotspur should Harry Redknapp go — had they a new stadium on stream, it would help — and as much as he still has a romantic notion about Liverpool and an interesting bond with Sir Alex Ferguson at Manchester United, Chelseaare in his system.
And how it would appeal to Mourinho’s sense of mischief — and maybe revenge — to succeed Villas-Boas, his former protégé, the mini-Mourinho who had the temerity to ask for more responsibility then branched out to be a manager in his own right. The two no longer speak.
But then there are is the £18million in compensation that Mourinho wrung out of Abramovich, including £10million to exclude him from working in England for a period. That was to put off Spurs, and it worked, but it was a high price to pay for Abramovich, even if he has since wasted many more millions compensating managers he has sacked.
So here’s the rub. Maybe if there is a vacancy and Mourinho does want to return he might have to do something that he would find difficult: apologise to Abramovich for leaving five years ago with that lorry-load of cash. The owner indulges in generous payouts. But he does not readily forgive. Could Jose say sorry?